Path: hub.org!hub.org!nntp1.njy.teleglobe.net!teleglobe.net!news-spur1.maxwell.syr.edu!news.maxwell.syr.edu!sunqbc.risq.qc.ca!newsfeed.telusplanet.net!news0.telusplanet.net.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Hilary OstrovNewsgroups: alt.revisionism Subject: David Irving's Hymn of Hate - "a pathetic piece of work" Organization: myssiwyg* Reply-To: hostrov@telus.net Message-ID: X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 1.8/32.548 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 80 Date: Wed, 09 May 2001 00:58:40 GMT NNTP-Posting-Host: 216.232.143.81 X-Trace: news0.telusplanet.net 989369920 216.232.143.81 (Tue, 08 May 2001 18:58:40 MDT) NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 08 May 2001 18:58:40 MDT Xref: hub.org alt.revisionism:895207 Was Churchill a flasher? Churchill's War Volume 2: Triumph in Adversity David Irving (Focal Point Publications, £25) Reviewed by Andrew Roberts Hallelujah! Admirers of Sir Winston Churchill can breathe a huge sigh of relief. For 14 years since the publication of David Irving's first volume on Churchill they have been waiting to see what foul conspiracies the extreme Right-wing historian might have managed to dig up in the hundreds of archives from which he has worked, but in this 1,063-page hymn of hate it is clear he has not managed to land one single significant blow on the reputation of Britain's wartime leader. [...] Many of Irving's assertions are completely contradictory. If Churchill "invariably put the interests of the United States above those of his own country and its empire", why did he not warn the Americans of what was about to happen in Pearl Harbour? Or if Mr Irving's notorious views on Auschwitz are correct - that Jews were not being systematically killed there - why should Churchill be held to account for not ordering the RAF to bomb it? Mr Irving consistently wants it both ways, but consistently winds up getting neither. [...] The selective quotation is legion. When Irving claims Churchill wished to "eliminate" de Gaulle what Churchill in fact recommended to his Cabinet colleagues was that they should consider whether they should "eliminate de Gaulle as a political force and face Parliament and France upon the issue". Irving's entire Pearl Harbour theory rests upon an obvious misreading of the diary of the permanent under-secretary at the Foreign Office, Sir Alec Cadogan. If Mr Irving really has, as his publisher's blurb suggests, spent 27 years researching and writing this book, then he has wasted half a lifetime. For in its long series of silly, snide, unproven innuendoes he has ultimately produced only a rather pathetic piece of work. Instead of trying to rebuild his historical reputation which was so damaged by his defeat in the Irving v Lipstadt and Penguin Books libel trial last year, he has written something that will only convince the most extreme Right-wing conspiracy theorists. When Irving writes that Churchill was of "partly Jewish blood, although safely diluted", he is simply being repulsive. When he claims that Churchill "was ambivalent about why he was really fighting this ruinous war", he is deliberately ignoring the evidence of dozens of the finest speeches ever delivered in the English tongue, which explained to Britain and the world between 1939 and 1945 in utterly uncompromising language precisely why Nazism had to be extirpated for human civilisation to survive and prosper. When he writes that the Duke of Windsor was forced to leave Portugal in August 1940 at British "pistol point" Irving is simply writing rubbish. [...] If you have £20 to spend on a book on Churchill, buy Geoffrey Best's excellent work Churchill: A Study in Greatness, (reviewed on the facing page), not this tendentious collection of ostensibly politically motivated slurs on the memory of the man who preserved the right of freedom of speech in this country. It is a right that has never been more abused than by David Irving.http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/dynamic/lifestyle/books/top_review.html?in_review_id=388669&in_review_text_id=335175 hro ===================== Hilary Ostrov E-mail: hostrov@telus.net WWW: http://www3.telus.net/myssiwyg/ The Nizkor Project http://www.nizkor.org/
Home ·
Funding ·
Site Map ·
What's New? ·
Search
Nizkor
© The Nizkor Project, 1991-2009
This site is intended for educational purposes to teach about the Holocaust and to combat hatred.
Any
statements or excerpts found on this site are for educational purposes only.
As part of these educational purposes, Nizkor may include on this website materials, such as excerpts
from the writings of racists and antisemites. Far from approving these writings, Nizkor condemns them and provides
them so that its readers can learn the nature and extent of hate and antisemitic discourse. Nizkor urges the readers
of these pages to condemn racist and hate speech in all of its forms and manifestations.